Yoga Education

In education circles, there is a concept called Bloom’s Taxonomy. In 1956, a committee led by Benjamin Bloom, identified three domains of educational activities:

* Cognitive: mental skills (Thinking)
* Affective: growth in feelings or emotional areas (Feeling)
* Psychomotor: manual or physical skills (Doing)

Each domain, or category, of learning can then be described by the types of objectives for learning, and these objectives need to be progressive. That is, within each category there are levels that must be mastered before progressing to the next. For example, in the cognitive domain, one must be able to “recall” knowledge before being able to understand it, then you can apply it, and then synthesize or finally evaluate the knowledge.

One would assume that yoga classes teach primarily in the pyschomotor domain, so let’s take a closer look at that. Unfortunately, Bloom and the gang spent so much time and energy on the cognitive and affective domains, they never got around to further delineating the progressive objectives in the pyschomotor domain. Nevertheless, later scholars did the work and there are several competing lists. I prefer the Dave (1967) list that goes as follows:

1. Imitation – copy the actions of another
2. Manipulation – reproduce activity from instruction
3. Precision – Execute skill reliably, independent of help
4. Articulation – Adapt and integrate expertise
5. Naturalization – Unconscious mastery of activity and related skills at strategic level

Most yoga classes include types 1, 2, and 3. Few include 4 & 5. Think about it: if you have never done Balasana (child’s pose) you need to first see it, then try it, and practice it. Pretty easy. Now, let’s say you do have a firm understanding of the pose and can “execute reliably, independent of help.” Great! Now what? Well, how about some variations? That would be “Articulation – Adapt and integrate expertise.” How about knowing that it is a good pose to do after backbends? You might seem to gravitate to that pose naturally… sometimes it just seems like time for child’s pose. That would be “Naturalization – Unconscious mastery of activity and related skills at strategic level.” But it has to start with levels 1, 2, 3, and 4… in that order.

Now, take a more difficult pose like Uttita Trikonasa (triangle pose). A beginner can see someone do the pose and try to imitate it, but it takes some time and practice to develop some precision – learning to position the feet correctly, extend the side body, balance the weight on both legs, keep the pelvis forward, and so forth. It’s easy enough remember the 101 independent movements, but then get them to all line up is an advanced topic…. so then what? Where is the Articulation and Naturalization? Check it out: next time you are in the pose, flex your feet a little. Or, change the tilt of your hip.

The best example I have ever seen of teaching levels 4 & 5 are from Charles MacInerney. If you’ve ever been to his class, you know how he asks you to do Cat-Cow sequence, and then says, “Now, make something up.” The entire class starts moving in their own directions, twisting, arching, squatting, all with a general “cat-cow” shape. What do we learn from this? We learn that our bodies and our asanas interact with each other. This is how the student learns to internalize their yoga practice, rather than simply imitating. It becomes a learning experience, rather than being rote exercises.

Resources used as source for this blog post:

    http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/hrd/bloom.html

    http://www.businessballs.com/bloomstaxonomyoflearningdomains.htm

    http://farr-integratingit.net/Theory/CriticalThinking/psychomotor.htm

A nice “Bloom’s Rose” image:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Blooms_rose.svg

Estimating

I was recently asked to estimate the effort required to develop materials for an instructor-led training course.  Accurate estimating is important in order to have a successful project for many reasons. So, how do we know? How can we guess-timate, let alone provide an accurate estimate of effort?

Usually, when someone asks “How long will this take?” they are really asking two questions. First, they are asking, “How much will it cost?”  because they need to know how many billable hours of service they need to contract with me for. And second, they are asking, “When will it be done?” to know when they can start teaching the class.  Let’s look at the first question in this article.

To estimate instructional design and development effort, I have developed the following  “rule of thumb” matrix. The two Course Development Estimating Matrixmost important aspects of estimating are the complexity of what you need to teach, and what you have to draw upon for content.

For example, a one-hour training on something well known, with existing content readily available, that is simple in nature – that is simple technically, or simple physically, or simple conceptually – should take about 10 hours to develop. That should give the developer sufficient time to analyze the material, design and develop the material, the layout, the agenda, the exercises, and so forth, including responding to reviews and feedback.

For a more complex subjects — either more complex conceptually, or more complex delivery formats, or even more complex because of corporate politics — additional time is required. Each level of complexity need to be looked at to determine its impact on the project.

Another question to ask about subject matter is, “Does the instructor already know the material?” If so, the project will be less complex than if we are developing material to be taught by someone new to the material.  In the first case, simple Instructor Notes will do, but for the later a more complete Guide to Instruction may be required.

The same goes for the maturity of the content. How well known is it? Or do we have to make it up as we go along? Is there an existing body of content to draw upon?  The more material already exists for the subject matter, the quicker it will be to develop.  But if we are teaching a course on “best practices”, and those practices have not yet been clearly defined, that subject matter is complex. A good example of this is newly developed software systems.  By definition, if the software is not yet in general use, it is complex.

Finally, remember that this does not include time of other people, such as reviewers and approvers, and this does not mean that the training will be ready in 30 hours from right now!  I’ll write about the question, “When will it be ready?”  in a later blog.

Best to you,

Barbara