Author Archives: bopyt

Yoga Education

I’ve been thinking the meaning of “education” in the context of yoga classes. There is education, and then there is guided practice. Most classes are the latter, with perhaps a bit of instruction thrown in if you are lucky.

Most yoga classes I have been to use same modes of instruction: demonstration and participation. The leader shows the moves, asks the students to complete a series of movements, and may offer suggestions on form or alignment. These classes work primarily, if not entirely, at the psychomotor domain. They teach muscle memory. They teach the body how to relax, how to open, or how to stretch. Very valuable stuff, of course.

However, there is more to us than just our bodies and there are many modes of learning available to us besides muscle memory. We are thinking creatures and have cognitive and emotional needs that are not being met by these methods.

The teacher training I recently attended included 20 hours of anatomy. There were a few things that I learned in this class that I wish I had learned years ago. The whole thing about antagonist and protagonist muscles for example. If I had known that, in order to get my hamstrings to stretch, I should get my quadriceps to contract it would have been very helpful.  I had teachers that told me, “Raise your kneecaps!” But I had no idea why they were saying that. Being a thinking person, I think this information would have been useful!

Most of us don’t know our bodies very well…we neglected and ignored them for so long that now we need our brain’s assistance in coming to terms with them. Many of us have a learning style that needs to know “why” something works.  We’re not very good at just memorizing steps and series of a simple movements. But if we understand the theory and concepts behind body movement, and know why it is good for us to “bend at the hips, not at the back” we can remember to tell our bodies to do it.

My favorite classes include a little talk about yoga philosophy, and also include a guided meditation. These may work at the cognitive levels, but as they say, “telling ain’t training.”  I don’t know that I’ve ever been to a yoga class where we have been asked to really think about yoga, use critical reflection, or examine our assumptions.

For my first yoga class offering, I want to explore this with beginning yoga students. I am designing a course that meets my criteria for sound instructional design: there will be clear objectives, objectives will include psychomotor, cognitive and affective domains, there will be an assessment and a progression of objectives that lead students from where they are to an understanding as well as an ability to do a series of poses. It will definitely include a workbook with questions for reflection and suggestions for continued learning. I promise that I will also demonstrate movements and ask students to “to relax, to open, and to stretch.” I will not neglect the psychomotor learning domain.

I think it’s time, and it’s up to me to step it up a notch for yoga education. I’m not a gym teacher putting people through the paces so that their body gets some exercise. I am a yoga instructor. I teach yoga. At the end of the day, I want to know that my students learned something, that they can do something and explain to me why they are doing it.

If you have suggestions on what I should include in my course, please leave a reply. My goal is to have the basic design complete by 12/31/2010, and then find a space to deliver the course in early 2011. I will report back. :)

Yoga Hype vs. Yoga Is

I just finished reading Neal Pollack’s funny new book Stretch: The Unlikely Making of a Yoga Dude. This is a great book if you’ve been in the yoga world for some time. If you haven’t, you likely just won’t get it. Pollack pokes fun at the hype and yet shows a deep reverence for the deeper philosophical underpinnings of yoga. His descriptions of farting in a yoga class are hilarious.

Is yoga a physical exercise? or preparation for meditation? or a profound spiritual practice? or a tool for subtle energetic re-charging? Really, I find it to be all these and more. When confronted with the choice of yoga hype and popularity where it is being taught in gyms on on the street, and on the other hand yoga as a secret world that you have to study for years to truly understand and to do anything less is to be a poser… I will say this is a fool’s choice. I will take the middle ground and choose again. Yoga is for everyone, how ever they come to it, whatever they get out of it. Yoga is. And I hope it is for you too.

Yoga Education

In education circles, there is a concept called Bloom’s Taxonomy. In 1956, a committee led by Benjamin Bloom, identified three domains of educational activities:

* Cognitive: mental skills (Thinking)
* Affective: growth in feelings or emotional areas (Feeling)
* Psychomotor: manual or physical skills (Doing)

Each domain, or category, of learning can then be described by the types of objectives for learning, and these objectives need to be progressive. That is, within each category there are levels that must be mastered before progressing to the next. For example, in the cognitive domain, one must be able to “recall” knowledge before being able to understand it, then you can apply it, and then synthesize or finally evaluate the knowledge.

One would assume that yoga classes teach primarily in the pyschomotor domain, so let’s take a closer look at that. Unfortunately, Bloom and the gang spent so much time and energy on the cognitive and affective domains, they never got around to further delineating the progressive objectives in the pyschomotor domain. Nevertheless, later scholars did the work and there are several competing lists. I prefer the Dave (1967) list that goes as follows:

1. Imitation – copy the actions of another
2. Manipulation – reproduce activity from instruction
3. Precision – Execute skill reliably, independent of help
4. Articulation – Adapt and integrate expertise
5. Naturalization – Unconscious mastery of activity and related skills at strategic level

Most yoga classes include types 1, 2, and 3. Few include 4 & 5. Think about it: if you have never done Balasana (child’s pose) you need to first see it, then try it, and practice it. Pretty easy. Now, let’s say you do have a firm understanding of the pose and can “execute reliably, independent of help.” Great! Now what? Well, how about some variations? That would be “Articulation – Adapt and integrate expertise.” How about knowing that it is a good pose to do after backbends? You might seem to gravitate to that pose naturally… sometimes it just seems like time for child’s pose. That would be “Naturalization – Unconscious mastery of activity and related skills at strategic level.” But it has to start with levels 1, 2, 3, and 4… in that order.

Now, take a more difficult pose like Uttita Trikonasa (triangle pose). A beginner can see someone do the pose and try to imitate it, but it takes some time and practice to develop some precision – learning to position the feet correctly, extend the side body, balance the weight on both legs, keep the pelvis forward, and so forth. It’s easy enough remember the 101 independent movements, but then get them to all line up is an advanced topic…. so then what? Where is the Articulation and Naturalization? Check it out: next time you are in the pose, flex your feet a little. Or, change the tilt of your hip.

The best example I have ever seen of teaching levels 4 & 5 are from Charles MacInerney. If you’ve ever been to his class, you know how he asks you to do Cat-Cow sequence, and then says, “Now, make something up.” The entire class starts moving in their own directions, twisting, arching, squatting, all with a general “cat-cow” shape. What do we learn from this? We learn that our bodies and our asanas interact with each other. This is how the student learns to internalize their yoga practice, rather than simply imitating. It becomes a learning experience, rather than being rote exercises.

Resources used as source for this blog post:

    http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/hrd/bloom.html

    http://www.businessballs.com/bloomstaxonomyoflearningdomains.htm

    http://farr-integratingit.net/Theory/CriticalThinking/psychomotor.htm

A nice “Bloom’s Rose” image:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Blooms_rose.svg

Yoga Goals

Today is, literally, the first day of the rest of my yoga life. I have just returned from the Living Yoga Program teacher training intensive. (I’m now 100 hours closer to a 200-hour Yoga Alliance/Yoga Registry teaching certificate!) These 10 days were the greatest gift I have ever given myself. The intensive was a powerful, informative, and transformative event. We had 90 minutes of yoga every morning, studied teaching the asanas in afternoon sessions and listened to yoga history, philosophy, business, and lifestyle lectures in evening sessions.

One of the big themes of the training was goal setting and how to set goals appropriately so that you can stay in flow. Goals that are too big result in fear. Goals that are too small result in boredom.

My goal today is: for the first 24 hours after returning home, to be aware of, and follow, my inner-most desire. My true desire. Yes, going to bed early last night was exactly what I wanted to do. Yes, taking 20 minutes for yoga this morning was exactly what I wanted to do. Yes, taking time to read some of the 200 emails that piled up is something that I want to do. Yes, writing a blog article is what I want to do. Yes, making notes of tasks that I want to take care of later (pay bills, contact my customers, laundry, grocery shopping) is what I want to do now.

The key skills I am exercising in selecting these goals are to listen to my inner-most voice, not second guess it, and then move into that desire. This is not the voice that wants to slouch and watch TV. This is the voice that wants to watch the birds flitting about in my front yard (What a pretty cardinal!). I may want to slouch in front of the TV later. But at this moment, right here, right now, I desire exactly what I am doing. Feeling my way through this first day is my only goal.

Moment by moment, hour by hour, I make goals that keep me in flow. Who knows, perhaps in one of these moments I will choose to think about goals for the next 24 hours, the next week, the next year, the rest of my yoga life. And when I do, I will choose goals that keep me in flow. In order to remain above boredom, I will choose goals big enough to challenge me and increase my skills. In order to remain out of fear, I will choose goals that are small enough that I will feel the joy of success. Staying in flow… and flowing in the direction set by that inner-most voice.

Estimating

I was recently asked to estimate the effort required to develop materials for an instructor-led training course.  Accurate estimating is important in order to have a successful project for many reasons. So, how do we know? How can we guess-timate, let alone provide an accurate estimate of effort?

Usually, when someone asks “How long will this take?” they are really asking two questions. First, they are asking, “How much will it cost?”  because they need to know how many billable hours of service they need to contract with me for. And second, they are asking, “When will it be done?” to know when they can start teaching the class.  Let’s look at the first question in this article.

To estimate instructional design and development effort, I have developed the following  “rule of thumb” matrix. The two Course Development Estimating Matrixmost important aspects of estimating are the complexity of what you need to teach, and what you have to draw upon for content.

For example, a one-hour training on something well known, with existing content readily available, that is simple in nature – that is simple technically, or simple physically, or simple conceptually – should take about 10 hours to develop. That should give the developer sufficient time to analyze the material, design and develop the material, the layout, the agenda, the exercises, and so forth, including responding to reviews and feedback.

For a more complex subjects — either more complex conceptually, or more complex delivery formats, or even more complex because of corporate politics — additional time is required. Each level of complexity need to be looked at to determine its impact on the project.

Another question to ask about subject matter is, “Does the instructor already know the material?” If so, the project will be less complex than if we are developing material to be taught by someone new to the material.  In the first case, simple Instructor Notes will do, but for the later a more complete Guide to Instruction may be required.

The same goes for the maturity of the content. How well known is it? Or do we have to make it up as we go along? Is there an existing body of content to draw upon?  The more material already exists for the subject matter, the quicker it will be to develop.  But if we are teaching a course on “best practices”, and those practices have not yet been clearly defined, that subject matter is complex. A good example of this is newly developed software systems.  By definition, if the software is not yet in general use, it is complex.

Finally, remember that this does not include time of other people, such as reviewers and approvers, and this does not mean that the training will be ready in 30 hours from right now!  I’ll write about the question, “When will it be ready?”  in a later blog.

Best to you,

Barbara

Dharma Yoga

I attended a different yoga class today, the 9:30am Hatha Yoga class with Keith at Dharma Yoga.  Keith is the founder and director of the center.  He has a great demeanor, and a fabulous voice for yoga.  The three Om’s at the beginning of the class reverberated through my entire being.  Keith began the class with a brief discussion and a setting of intentions. The room is comfortably warm, spacious, and with soft lighting.

As my dear readers know, I have been a fan of the Iyengar, no-bull-shit style of yoga for some time. I hesitated going to this center because I knew that there would be a two elements that I am not fond of: music and flow.   The music was generally not too distracting in this class. It was mostly sitar-cum-new-agey. However,  he did play some Norah Jones during savasana (and, too loudly for my opinion) but made up for it by also playing a Cat Stevens song that reminded me of my first glimmers of spirituality as a teenager. I’m still not a fan of music during yoga, but he scored 1 for 2 on this.

I’m not a fan of flow either. I prefer to take a pose, really take the pose, and then be done with the pose.  We only did a couple of series in this class. For example:  Down Dog, through Plank to Chaturanga, and then to Up Dog, and back again to Down Dog. Four or five times… not out of control. I was OK with this because Keith didn’t “count off’ the poses, but let us do the series at our own pace. It was not a problem for me, and did give my arms a good strength-building work out.

One unique element in this class was a pairing up the students to do assists. Partner One did Down Dog, and Partner Two assisted by pressing and encouraging various aspects of the pose. In another assist, I received some Thai massage from my partner while in Uttanasana. Very nice.

The session ended with a long savasana (to Norah Jones!? and Cat Stevens!!). Afterwards, Keith reminded us of our intentions to bring us full circle form the start of the class, and led us into a five-minute meditation on the breath.

After the class, I felt rejuvenated as well as feeling I had had a good workout. Kudos to Keith! I’ll be back for more.  I may have found a new yoga home.

Your Own Best Assistant

One of my goals for 2010 is to earn enough to afford to hire a part-time assistant.  A girl just needs help sometimes to keep it all together. I dream of having the very best assistant for me. She is clever, upbeat, and flexible. She is kind, but gives me tough love. She is a clear thinker, and very creative. She is way more organized than I am.

Clearly, as I am just starting down the path to financial independence, I can’t currently afford to pay someone to be my assistant.  In the meanwhile, I guess I just need to be my own best assistant.

Here are some of the duties that I will assume, as my own very best assistant:

  1. Make the appointments that I need, well in advance
  2. Make sure I keep all of the commitments that I have made
  3. Stay caught up with my correspondence
  4. Make the hard phone calls that I don’t really want to make
  5. Remember my siblings on their birthdays
  6. Conduct detailed research for purchasing decisions
  7. Keep an eye out for things that I would enjoy doing
  8. Do the filing and keep me organized
  9. Remind me what my budget is
  10. Buy me a latte now and then
  11. Keep me focused on what is important
  12. Hire others to take care of additional chores

If you have suggestions of other duties or qualifications that I need for this job, please leave your comments here!

Signed,

Barbara
My Own Best Assistant

Intregral approach to product management

Integral Theory

Ken Wilber is a contemporary theorist who has developed a new way of looking at systems. Every system, such as human systems… or in my example products … can be looked at in terms of four quadrants, or dimensions. These four quadrants are based on a cross section derived from two axis: the Individual and the Collective, and the Interior and the Exterior. Thus, the four quadrants are:

  • Individual Interior
  • Individual Exterior
  • Collective Interior
  • Collective Exterior

Application to Products

Applying this to products, the Individual in question is the product. The Collective are the community of consumers and providers of the product.  Thus, we can discuss the product as having quadrants or dimensions:

  • The Product Interior  – the materials the architecture, the code itself, the platform.
  • The Product Exterior – the outer view of the product extending from interfaces to the final packaging.
  • The Collective Interior – the personal experiences with the product by its developers and users.
  • The Collective Exterior – the collective experience with the product’s supporting and surrounding systems.

Product Management

Effective product management clearly requires attention to all four quadrants.  Have you known product managers that spend too much time on managing the packaging and marketing, and  not enough on the internal integrity of the product? Or, vice versa?   Excluding attention on any one of the quadrants can lead to failure. And looking at a product decision’s impact in all four quadrants can lead to success.

Integral Quadrants

Integral Quadrants

  • The Product Interior – is the product internally consistent? Does it have an architecture that works at the logic, module, and macro levels? Does it have integrity and is it trustworthy?
  • The Product Exterior – are the interfaces consistent and in alignment with the function? For example, you would not put a “fun” interface on an enterprise software, nor would you but a green-screen data interface on a piece of consumer software. The product’s “exteriors” must provide be in alignment and consistent with the product purpose or function.
  • The Collective Interior – The individual’s experience with the product. Remember that this includes the consumers as well as the producers. If the producers can’t stand to work on the product, that is a collective “we” failure.
  • The Collective Exterior – The collective experience  both in term of it’s functional fit for use, and experience with the supporting and surrounding systems to the software, such as help desks or social networks. This is also the quadrant were we look at how “green” a product is as well.

More later… let me know what you think…

-B

My Yoga Life

My blog. My life. My yoga. My yoga life blog!

Wordle

Wow, here is my blog wordled! love the big fat “YOGA” in the middle.

Wordle: www.barbopyt.com